i just read the note Roger sent commenting on Frieder Nake post
i would say two things
one is that in the construction of abstract scaffolds that work to deal with the world, one important issue i when, how and to what you can atribute a truth value
gotlob frege made the point that there is no way to attribute a truth value to a word, only senteces can be right or wrong. What we mean exactly by strawberyy or 3 cannot be established and each and everyone probaly sees it differently, however strawberries are small plants or 3 tiemes 3 is 9 can be showwn to be more accurate, have a higher truth value than other sentences such as strawberries are blue or 3 times 3 is 2.
then in all cultures there are creative environments where truth value matters.
Ibn Rushd, known in latin as Averroes (cordoba 1126 marakesh 1198) wrote a beautiful and interesting text "discours décisif" (Flamarion, Paris 1996) where he argues that there are three kinds of truth, scientific, legal and religious and each domain works with different methods to identify the truth value a a given statement. He points out that there is a first phase which is to identify a new idea and then a second phase in which the task is to convince others that this idea is true in either scientifc, legal or religious terms
it is interesting to note that Ibn Rushd argumes that in a cool, smart society there is no need for confrontation or conflict between these forms of truth.
so i would say that most probably the capacities of any normal human are quite similar at the base but of course the very large variability in health, nutritional and intelectual environment produce very different people with very different understandgs and competences.
much of catholic europe for instance has had for several centuries a culture in which science was dirty but powerful while art was clean but powerless, in counries like spain the main pedagogical objective for centuries has been to teach, convey a disgust and anthipathy for mathematics.
musical, cooking, scientific, rethorical or artistic skills are social, thus if you are lucky to fall in good company you grow.
--- On Tue, 5/12/09, roger malina <email@example.com> wrote:
> From: roger malina <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: [Yasmin_discussions] One Two Three More Cultures
> To: "YASMIN DISCUSSIONS" <Yasmin_discussions@estia.media.uoa.gr>
> Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 8:02 AM
> I enjoyed your story about random generators on computers
> that in fact are pseudo random generators
> the conclusion of your story was
> ¨""That's the story. Its point is that students usually
> have no way to
> understand, let alone develop for themselves those
> But they do need them now. C.P. Snow would treat this more
> or less as
> a language problem. The two cultures cannot talk to each
> other. But I
> have come to believe, it is a matter of attitude. What do
> you expect
> and request from yourself!""
> Frieder Nake
> I think I agreee with your point= its what I call the
> burning issue problem.
> When you really need to do something you dont ask the
> question what
> university department teaches it, or which funding agency
> paid for it,
> you work with the people who have the expertise you need
> whether they
> have a phd or not or what profession they call themselves.
> But the problem is quite deep, because depending on the way
> grow up, some things are natural and some things are really
> I was just reading Alan Lightman's book of essays " a sense
> of the
> mysterious" which is a great book on the two cultures
> ( there is an interesting interview of him on line
> Lightman re iterates a " wisdom" that i remember my father
> telling me
> as a kid= Alan Lightman makes the generalisation that there
> a number of good examples of first rate scientists who went
> on to
> do good work in the arts and humanities, but there are
> no examples of people who started their careers as artists
> and then
> went on to make important discoveries in the sciences or
> or mathematics
> If he is right= there is not only a matter of the attitude
> as you argue,
> or of language problems as you quote Snow, but that in fact
> the way
> we are trained as kids and young people actually changes
> your brain
> and the way that you perceive the world; Someone with a
> mathematical training as a young person, actually sees the
> world differently and
> thinks differently than a person trained and who worked as
> a poet or painter
> in their youth.
> Is this true ? is this "asymmetry" true between how
> the arts and the sciences
> as training affect a brain structure/cognition/perception
> differerence ?
> Yasmin_discussions mailing list
> Yasmin URL: http://www.media.uoa.gr/yasmin
> HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: click on the link to the list you wish to
> subscribe to. In the page that will appear ("info page"),
> enter e-mail address, name, and password in the fields found
> further down the page.
> HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: on the info page, scroll all the way
> down and enter your e-mail address in the last field. Enter
> password if asked. Click on the unsubscribe button on the
> page that will appear ("options page").
> HOW TO ENABLE / DISABLE DIGEST MODE: in the options page,
> find the "Set Digest Mode" option and set it to either on or
Yasmin_discussions mailing list
Yasmin URL: http://www.media.uoa.gr/yasmin
HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: click on the link to the list you wish to subscribe to. In the page that will appear ("info page"), enter e-mail address, name, and password in the fields found further down the page.
HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: on the info page, scroll all the way down and enter your e-mail address in the last field. Enter password if asked. Click on the unsubscribe button on the page that will appear ("options page").
HOW TO ENABLE / DISABLE DIGEST MODE: in the options page, find the "Set Digest Mode" option and set it to either on or off.